|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
   |
Posted - 2010.03.15 23:32:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Leneerra
But please implement big's censored service before you start closing it down.
I still want my 4.something B isk, I still think you owe me and all your depositors intrest over the period where you locked acounts as it was not a liquiation lock.
And I still do not trust you even with my limited api key.
tbh I think I also want your api keys so I can avoid ever doing business with any of you or your alts again.
Another satisfied customer.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 01:39:00 -
[2]
I don't see any issue with ebank continuing to operate at this point. I'm sure there's some more comedy that can be milked out of this.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 02:01:00 -
[3]
As I said once everything came out in the wash that ebank should have been liquidated and the investors paid out so they could move on. Ray has gone to great efforts to rescue ebank as a going concern for which starting in the negatives rather than on the zero mark is a bad start.
Using the ebank data collection to publically shame the investors would a far more valuable process.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.16 23:02:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Proton Power
I agree that at this point EBANK should try for full recovery, anything less 6mths later would be just another failure as a whole.
So are you saying that by the end of May (6 months after the op) that if the isk is not recovered to 100% that you would consider this process to be a failure?
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 00:18:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Proton Power
No I am saying that customers have waited 6mths already, at this point go for the gold and get to 100%, anytihng less would be a failure.
I tend to agree. The period of excitment is over (other than Ray's angry posting) and they might as well finish the job as it's too late to turn back.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 02:25:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Shiva Andromeda
Without criticizing the decisions made, what is the rationale behind trying to recover? I dont understand how the current progress is worth the time and effort and negativity. What does anyone gain?
There is no benefit to account holders.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 03:45:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Shiva Andromeda
Originally by: Professor Leech
Originally by: Shiva Andromeda
Without criticizing the decisions made, what is the rationale behind trying to recover? I dont understand how the current progress is worth the time and effort and negativity. What does anyone gain?
There is no benefit to account holders.
Is there any benefit to the people in charge? This cluster**** looks like a waste of time.
Perfomance is measured in tears per page of the thread. Take a guess at the other potential benefits to the board of ebank.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 18:45:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Ray McCormack
It would be a dumb **** like you that creates an account in a bank that has suspended all activity, on par with your level of brain activity.
So that's what you think of people opening all those new accounts?
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:12:00 -
[9]
Actually any spare isk would be best invested in my corporation. No matter the amount I can pay more interest than ebank, because I can pay interest.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:25:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Atima
Really I think people forget how great an accomplishment EBANK was. Keep going Ray, the community believes in you.
Ebanks main accomplishment is losing 1.3T isk and not noticing it. I agree that this is a great feat.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
|
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.17 22:41:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Companion Qube
Doesn't that make ebank about 300b more incompetent than goonswarm? Just saying.
Being worse than the worst alliance in the game? That is another great feat. There's no doubt that ebank is exceptional.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.03.18 00:25:00 -
[12]
Thanks Marcus, my faith in ebank is restored. Primarily because of the decrease in A - L.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven
this thread is obviously going places
|
|
|
| |
|